| |
PNW
CONSERVATION TILLAGE HANDBOOK SERIES
Chapter 2 - Systems and Equipment, No. 14, Summer 1989
Reduced
Tillage for Green Manure Legumes
Roger
Veseth
Legumes crops grown
for seed or as a green manure can often help improve the production potential
of the following cereal crop in the rotation. However, the traditional
practice of plowing under a legume crop as a green manure before conventional
seeding of a winter cereal can be disastrous where soil erosion is a potential
problem. Very high rates of soil erosion can occur overwinter when the'
residue from a green manure legume is completely buried and the winter
cereal is planted into a fine smooth seedbed. Leaving a moderate amount
of surface residue, with reduced tillage incorporation of green manure
legumes, can bean effective option to control erosion while still achieving
the other benefits of the legume crop.
Legume Rotation Benefits
There has been an increasing interest in legumes for seed, forage
and as green manure in crop rotations in recent years. Nitrogen (N) fixation
from N in the air can help to reduce N fertilizer inputs and production
costs for the following crop. The amount of N fixation by the legume crop
depends on the amount of plant-available N in the soil, legume species,
growing conditions and other factors.
Besides potentially contributing some N, legumes often also have some
other important benefits for the following cereal crop in rotation. These
benefits are often lumped into what, is termed the "rotation effect".
This is largely the result of reduced incidence of diseases and other
pests associated with cereals or any other crop in the rotation. Other
possible factors, such as increased activity of beneficial soil microbes,
improved soil aggregation, reduced soil compaction and unused stored soil
water available for the following crop, may also be part of the rotation
effect. In addition to legumes, other non-cereal crops, such as rape seed,
provide a rotation effect benefit for the following cereal crop.
Green Manure Tillage Research
The results of a 1985-86 field research study near Pullman, WA, demonstrate
that a moderate amount of crop residue from green manure legumes can be
maintained on the surface to control soil erosion without influencing
the yield potential of the following winter wheat crop. The research was
conducted by David Bezdicek, soil microbiologist at Washington State University,
in cooperation with other researchers from WSU and the USDA-Agricultural
Research Service. The research included a comparison of Austrian winter
pea and red clover as green manure crops preceding winter wheat under
conventional reduced tillage systems.
Tillage and Rotation Comparisons
Different crop rotations were utilized to allow inclusion of both
red clover (a biennial crop) and Austrian winter pea (a fall-seeded annual)
in the study. All of the research site was in spring barley in 1983. For
the red clover trials, spring wheat was seeded in 1984 and immediately
over seeded with red clover using a double disk drill. For the Austrian
winter pea trials, winter wheat was seeded in the fall of 1983 and Austrian
winter pea in the fall of 1984. Vigorous growth of both legumes was sufficient
to control all weeds through the 1985 growing season. The conventional
and reduced tillage treatments were conducted in July.
In both tillage treatments, the legume residue was flail chopped to facilitate
ease of equipment operations and incorporation of the residue. Conventional
tillage practices included moldboard plowing, followed by a shallow disking.
The reduced tillage treatments were shallow disked twice. A non-selective
herbicide was applied to all plots prior to seeding winter wheat. Both
tillage treatments were seeded in October with a conventional double disk
drill. The effects of N fertilizer rates of O, 60 and 120 pounds N/acre
for the winter wheat were also compared,
A no-till winter wheat trial after a seed crop of spring dry pea was included
in the study for comparison with the two green manure legumes. The primary
reason for this treatment was to provide a comparison between forage/green
manure legumes and seed legumes as crop rotation options.
Surface Residue
As seen in Table 1, the reduced tillage treatment left substantially
more residue, of both green manure legumes, on the surface after seeding
the winter wheat than with conventional plowing and disking. No difficulties
were encountered in seeding through the residue with a conventional double
disk drill.
Winter Wheat Yields
At each N fertilizer rate, winter wheat yields were slightly higher
with reduced tillage than conventional tillage after the green manure
legumes (Table 2). One exception was a slightly lower winter wheat yield
under reduced tillage than conventional tillage following red clover at
the O pound N/acre rate. The 60 pounds N/acre fertilizer rates substantially
increased wheat yields after Austrian winter pea under both tillage systems
and after red clover under reduced tillage. The 120 pounds N/acre rate
generally gave little or no yield increase over the 60 pounds N/acre rate
with the green manure legumes. With no N fertilizer, the yield of winter
wheat after both green manure crops under both tillage systems compared
favorably with yield of no-till winter wheat after a seed crop of spring
dry peas.
Table 1. Estimated amount of surface residue and percent surface cover
remaining after seeding winter wheat following green manure crops of Austrian
winter pee and red clover under conventional and reduced tillage systems,
1985, Pullman, WA (Bezdicek and others, WSU).
| Tillage
System |
Surface
residue amount 1 and percent residue cover |
| Austrian
winter pea |
Red
clove |
| |
(lb/acre) |
(%
cover) |
(lb/acre) |
(%
cover) |
| Conventional |
130 |
8 |
80 |
5 |
| Reduced |
1,410 |
60 |
890 |
44 |
1 Initial legume dry wt. residue amounts at harvest:
AWP - 5,700 Ib/acre; RC - 3,600 Ib/acre.
Table 2. Influence
of conventional and reduced tillage systems and nitrogen (N) fertilizer
rate on yield of winter wheat following Austrian winter pea and red clover
green manure crops, 1986, Pullman, WA (Bezdicek and others, WSU).
| Previous
crop and
N
fertilizer rate |
Tillage
system |
| Conventional |
Reduced |
| Austrian
winter pea |
| 0 |
55 |
59 |
| 60 |
65 |
71 |
| 120 |
67 |
69 |
| Red
clover |
| 0 |
75 |
70 |
| 60 |
73 |
78 |
| 120 |
78 |
82 |
| Spring
peas |
| 0 |
- |
59 |
| 60 |
- |
61 |
| 120 |
- |
59 |
l Yields
of no-till winter wheat after a seed crop of spring dry peas are
included in the trial for comparison of seed and forage/green manure
legumes preceding winter wheat in the rotation.
Legume Residue
N Recovery
One management concern with green manure legumes, and legumes
in general, is the speed of release and availability of the plant residue
N for the following crop. Will the N in residue remaining on the soil
surface be as available as the N in residue completely incorporated in
the soil? One approach Bezdicek and other researchers have used to help
answer this question is through the use of N-15, a heavier' 'labeled"
N source which can be differentiated from the normal N-14 available in
the soil through laboratory analysis. This method can help track the movement
of N from the plant residue.
The research included a combination of greenhouse and field experiments
in 1987 and 1988. First, N-15 fertilizer was added to greenhouse pots
of spring peas over a growing season to obtain a plant N-15 uptake of
20 percent or more. The plants were clipped at the green manure development
stage and either soil incorporated or applied to the surface on small
confined plots in the field. Winter wheat was seeded in the small plots
and the level of N- 15 of the wheat plant and soil was monitored in the
laboratory periodically throughout the growing season.
Based on the results of the study, uptake of the spring pea residue N
by the wheat was essentially the same under soil-incorporated and surface
residue treatments. Nearly 100 percent of the spring pea residue-N was
accounted for in the wheat plant and soil analyses under the soil incorporate
treatment. Recovery of residue-N from the wheat plant was similar under
the residue placement treatments. Recovery of residue-N from the soil
was about 10 percent (roughly 10 pounds N/acre in this case) less with
the surface residue application than with soil incorporation. The mechanisms
for this small amount of N losses with surface application of the pea
residue are not known at this time. Bezdicek points out, however, that
this small difference in N recovery from the soil probably would not result
in a significant yield difference in following crops.
Chemical Kill and No-Till Seeding
The 1985-86 field study by Bezdicek also included a chemical kill/no-till
seeding treatment after the two green manure legumes, along with the conventional
and reduced tillage treatments previously discussed. Corresponding winter
wheat yields tended to be lower than with either of the other two tillage
treatments. So far, however, there have been too many unanswered questions
about herbicide interactions and other possible factors to draw any firm
conclusions from the results. A new field study near Pullman is currently
underway to help answer some of the questions. Bezdicek and Alex Ogg,
USDA-ARS agronomist, planted winter wheat in the fall of 1988 following
several chemical and mechanical green manure treatments on Austrian winter
peas. All of the plots were seeded with the new USDA Cross-Slot no-till
research drill. The drill can effectively place seed and fertilizer in
tilled and notill conditions using a unique single disk/knife opener arrangement.
The green manure treatments include:
- Clip, flail-chop,
shallow disk, seed
- Chemical-kill,
flail-chop, seed
- Clip, flail-chop,
seed
- Chemical-kill,
clip, remove residue, seed
- Clip, remove residue,
seed
- Chemical-kill,
flail-chop, fumigate, seed
The soil fumigation
treatment (No. 6) will help to determine whether soilborne diseases are
associated with chemical-kill and/or no-till seedings. The study should
help to separate the chemical, tillage, disease and residue factors affecting
winter wheat yield potential following green manure legumes.
Conclusions
Based on the preliminary results of these studies, Bezdicek concludes
that reduced tillage is a viable option for green manure legumes. He found
that a moderate amount of green manure legume residue can be maintained
on the soil surface past seeding of the following winter wheat crop without
reducing wheat yield potential. This approach will help control erosion
and still maintain availability of N from the legume residue.
The results of chemical-kill/no-till seeding of winter wheat after green
manure legumes in the 1985-86 experiments were inconclusive. The new 1988-89
field study underway should help to provide more insight into the feasibility
of this management option.
|