PNW CONSERVATION
TILLAGE HANDBOOK SERIES
Chapter l -Erosion Impacts, No.4, Fall 1986
The high rate of
topsoil erosion on much of the sloping Northwest cropland has been a serious
problem for decades. Most people attribute the soil loss to water erosion
through surface runoff from rapid snowmelt or heavy rainfall, particularly
on frozen soils. Water erosion rates of over 150 tons of soil per acre,
about 1 inch of topsoil, in one winter season are not uncommon on steep
slopes. Although water erosion is one of the most important and most visible
mechanisms of soil loss, there is another erosion mechanism which is also
significantly reducing topsoil depth on certain landscape positions -
" tillage erosion".
Erosion from Tillage Implements
Tillage erosion, the movement of soil downhill during tillage operations,
has not received as much attention as water erosion. Over time, however,
tillage erosion is believed to be responsible for a significant reduction
in topsoil depth and increased subsoil exposure on hilltops and ridges
in agricultural land.
Although other tillage implements can move soil downhill, the moldboard
plow causes the most tillage erosion if the furrow slice
is turned downhill, called "downhill plowing,'' In contrast, "uphill
plowing, " where the furrow slice is turned uphill, may help hold
the soil in place on the slope or may possibly reverse the tillage erosion
process. Traditionally, downhill plowing has been more popular since it
has lower power and fuel requirements, and buries more of the crop residue
than uphill plowing. But, growers are eventually paying the price in reduced
yields at ridge tops as topsoil depth decreases.
Repeated downhill plowing acts as a slow motion conveyor belt as each
furrow slice is moved downslope. This downcutting effect is most apparent
on hilltops and ridges where soil removed is not replaced by soil moved
down from a higher landscape position.
Besides the increasing exposure of less productive subsoils, there is
other evidence of the tillage erosion process underway in the Palouse
and other Northwest farming areas with sloping cropland. Old fence lines
often form steep walls up to 6 feet or more in height where the uphill
farmer has plowed toward the fence and the downhill farmer plowed away
from the fence (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1. Old fence line showing the effect of ' 'tillage erosion" underway in the Palouse near Moscow, Idaho.
Estimates of Tillage
Erosion
Experimental studies on topsoil loss attributable to tillage erosion
are scarce, One of the early reports stressing the importance of tillage
erosion in the Palouse was by Verle Kaiser, a USDA-SCS agronomist in Whitman
County, WA, in 1961. Kaiser determined that there was a 2-foot loss of
soil depth on a Palouse hilltop during 31 years of farming between 1911
and 1942. An additional 2 feet of soil depth was lost during the next
17 years between 1942 and 1959. He attributed a substantial portion of
that loss in soil depth to tillage erosion, in addition to water erosion.
STEEP researcher Don McCOO1, USDA-ARS agricultural engineer at Pullman,
WA, recently made some measurements of soil loss that resulted from downhill
plowing with the moldboard plow. MCCOO1 found there was a 21-inch downhill
movement of the furrow using 16-inch plow shears set at 5 inches depth,
a tractor speed of slightly
over 3.5 miles per hour and a 25 to 30 percent slope. Over a 100-foot
slope length, the average soil loss was determined to be about 13-tons-per-acre.
Uphill plowing, under the same condition, resulted in an uphill soil movement
of 9 inches. MCCOO1 states that this uphill soil movement may compensate
for some or most of the downhill movement inherent in secondary tillage
operations with field cultivators and rod weeders and other implements.
MCCOO1 stresses that the amount of downhill soil movement with downhill
plowing would increase as the percent slope and tractor speed increased.
Cropland slopes of 20 to 35 percent are common in the Palouse region with
some slopes reaching 45 to 55 percent or more. This 13ton-per-acre soil
loss measured from a single downhill plowing is comparable to an average
overwinter soil loss to water erosion under winter wheat with a low-residue,
conventionally-tilled seedbed. Besides increasing exposure of subsoils,
MCCOO1 points out that tillage erosion increases slope steepness because
soil is removed more rapidly than it is replaced from the flatter, upper
portion of the slope.
Increasing Subsoil Exposure
Most hilltops and
ridges on the Palouse cropland and other areas of the Northwest now have
only shallow topsoil depth, if any topsoil is present. Exposure of less
productive, clayey or highly calcareous subsoils has greatly increased
due both to tillage erosion and water erosion.
In a 1978 Palouse Cooperative River Basin Study, it is estimated that
all of the original topsoil has been removed from 10 percent of the Palouse
cropland, exposing clayey or calcareous (high lime) subsoils. Another
60 percent of the cropland has lost 25 to 75 percent of the topsoil.
Washington State University soil scientists and STEEP researchers Alan
Busacca and Bruce Frazier currently have a research project underway to
estimate the proportion of Palouse landscape which has potential for exposure
of clayey or calcareous subsoils as topsoil depth is reduced. Through
historical and modern aerial photography, special imagery and on-site
monitoring, they plan to quantify the current rate of increasing subsoil
exposure.
Eventually, they hope to develop predictive equations for several Palouse
sites that will estimate the actual rates of increased subsoil exposure
under different rates of tillage and water erosion.
The two WSU soil scientists and research assistant Ann Rodman are also
evaluating the impacts of long-term uphill plowing on a farm near Dayton,
WA. Two adjacent fields, located on one landscape position, are being
evaluated for organic matter and organic carbon content, depth to subsoil,
depth to bedrock and other properties. One field has been uphill plowed
over the past 35 years while the other field has been downhill plowed
during that time.
Control Options
Tillage erosion can be reduced to a minimum with changes in management
practices. Some growers, who feel they need to continue using the moldboard
plow, are now uphill plowing on the contour. Uphill plowing helps counter
the downslope tillage erosion problem and also leaves slightly more of
the crop residue on the surface. The residue helps reduce the potential
for water erosion during the following crop year. Removing trash boards
from the plow will further increase the surface residue level.
Substituting chisel plows, sweeps or other non-inversion tillage implements
for the moldboard plow effectively reduces tillage erosion. The higher
surface residue levels of minimum or reduced tillage and no-till systems
effectively control water erosion and increase soil water storage for
a higher yield potential. Many growers are demonstrating that minimum
tillage and no-till are also very efficient, productive farming systems.
Recent advances in crop management technology including seeding equipment,
fertilizer placement, weed and disease management strategies, variety
development and alternate crops are helping to ensure the success of these
conservation farming systems.
Tillage erosion and water erosion together are sharply reducing topsoil
depth and corresponding production potential on the Palouse and other
sloping cropland areas of the Northwest. Control options are available
and are constantly being improved. It is time to explore some alternatives.
Roger Veseth is an Extension Conservation Tillage Specialist with Washington
State University and University of Idaho.
The PAW Conservation 1711age Handbook is available for $20 (including
new Series publication to be added) through County Extension offices in
Idaho, Oregon and Washington.
Heading Using the <h1>Tag
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molstias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Temporibus autem quibusdam et aut officiis debitis aut rerum necessitatibus saepe eveniet ut et voluptates repudiandae sint et molestiae non recusandae. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat."
Sub Head Using the h4 Tags
Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem. Ut enim ad minima veniam, quis nostrum exercitationem ullam corporis suscipit laboriosam, nisi ut aliquid ex ea commodi consequatur? Quis autem vel eum iure reprehenderit qui in ea voluptate velit esse quam nihil molestiae consequatur, vel illum qui dolorem eum fugiat quo voluptas nulla pariatur.