| |
Winter Wheat Performance Following
Pea, Lentil and Mustard and Residue Durability
Stephen Guy and
Robert Gareau
University of Idaho, Plant, Soil and Entomological Sciences
Objectives
- Evaluate the influence
of previous crops of spring dry pea, lentil and yellow condiment mustard
grown in 1994 on the agronomic performance of the following winter wheat
crop planted in the fall of 1994 and harvested in 1995.
- Evaluate crop
residue levels following dry pea, lentil and mustard and determine residue
durability over winter.
Location: Genesee,
Idaho
Annual precipitation: 20 inches
Rotation: spring barley, spring test crop (pea, lentil or mustard), winter
wheat test crop
Variety: 1994 crop: Columbia pea, Crimson lentil, Gisilba mustard; 1995
Madsen WW
Treatment
Dry pea, lentil,
or yellow mustard were previous crop treatments before winter wheat.
Comments
The 1994 spring crops
were grown using standard production methods of the individual crops.
In this case the only input on the mustard was a single wild oat herbicide
application. The 1995 winter wheat crop was treated to minimize weed effects
and fertilized based on current recommendations from the soil tests and
established yield goal. Prior to fall planting, the plot area was fertilized
with a ripper-shooter (applying 55 lb N, 30 lb P and 20 lb S per acre),
worked twice with a field cultivator, then planted with a double-disk
drill. The winter wheat was planted into dry soil in October, but emerged
over-winter after rain the beginning of November. Fertilizer ( 70 lb/a
of N ) was top dressed in the spring. There was adequate soil moisture
available for 1995. At three sites in each plot, post harvest residue
was assayed by gathering and weighing residue from a 1' X 8' area (1/2
the combine swath). The estimates of residue ground cover and winter wheat
crop green growth were done by three transects with the line-point method.
Individual plots were 25' wide and 500' long and each treatment was replicated
four times.
Results
1994
Crop Yield, lb/a
|
Crop |
Rep 1 |
Rep 2 |
Rep 3 |
Rep 4 |
Average |
|
Mustard |
1133 |
1484 |
1830 |
1542 |
1497 |
|
Pea |
3616 |
3441 |
3398 |
2853 |
3327 |
|
Lentil |
2518 |
2439 |
2875 |
1451 |
2321 |
|
LSD (5%) |
|
|
|
|
631 |
|
C.V. |
|
|
|
|
15.3 |
1994
Crop Residue After Harvest, lb/a
|
Crop |
Rep 1 |
Rep 2 |
Rep 3 |
Rep 4 |
Average |
|
Mustard |
5385 |
6608 |
7208 |
6884 |
6521 |
|
Pea |
2074 |
3742 |
3574 |
2003 |
2848 |
|
Lentil |
2759 |
4582 |
3502 |
2759 |
3400 |
|
LSD (5%) |
|
|
|
|
962 |
|
962 |
|
|
|
|
13.1 |
1994
Crop Residue After Harvest, % ground cover
|
Crop |
Rep 1 |
Rep 2 |
Rep 3 |
Rep 4 |
Average |
|
Mustard |
28 |
41 |
48 |
36 |
38 |
|
Pea |
50 |
49 |
40 |
47 |
47 |
|
Lentil |
50 |
44 |
37 |
41 |
43 |
|
LSD (5%) |
|
|
|
|
NS |
|
C.V. |
|
|
|
|
17.5 |
1994
Soil S Available 0-1' After Harvest, lb/a
|
Crop |
Rep 1 |
Rep 2 |
Rep 3 |
Rep 4 |
Average |
|
Mustard |
16 |
28 |
36 |
20 |
25 |
|
Pea |
44 |
40 |
44 |
36 |
41 |
|
Lentil |
40 |
60 |
36 |
44 |
45 |
|
LSD (5%) |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
C.V. |
|
|
|
|
22.8 |
1995
Yield of Winter Wheat After 1994 Spring Crops, bu/a
|
Crop |
Rep 1 |
Rep 2 |
Rep 3 |
Rep 4 |
Average |
|
Mustard |
84 |
93 |
112 |
117 |
101 |
|
Pea |
98 |
97 |
119 |
124 |
109 |
|
Lentil |
101 |
99 |
116 |
122 |
109 |
|
LSD (5%) |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
C.V. |
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
Crop
Residue After Planting Winter Wheat,
18 Oct 94, % ground cover
|
Crop |
Rep 1 |
Rep 2 |
Rep 3 |
Rep 4 |
Average |
|
Mustard |
43 |
67 |
59 |
67 |
59 |
|
Pea |
35 |
26 |
36 |
33 |
33 |
|
Lentil |
31 |
25 |
24 |
24 |
26 |
|
LSD (5%) |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
C.V. |
|
|
|
|
21.7 |
Crop
Residue After Planting Winter Wheat,
1 Dec 94, % ground cover
|
Crop |
Rep 1 |
Rep 2 |
Rep 3 |
Rep 4 |
Average |
|
Mustard |
49 |
66 |
59 |
61 |
59 |
|
Pea |
35 |
32 |
40 |
28 |
34 |
|
Lentil |
29 |
30 |
31 |
20 |
27 |
|
LSD (5%) |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
C.V. |
|
|
|
|
14.4 |
Crop
Residue After Planting Winter Wheat,
9 Feb 95, % ground cover
|
Crop |
Rep 1 |
Rep 2 |
Rep 3 |
Rep 4 |
Average |
|
Mustard |
56 |
65 |
62 |
67 |
62 |
|
Pea |
37 |
33 |
39 |
28 |
34 |
|
Lentil |
29 |
27 |
31 |
22 |
27 |
|
LSD (5%) |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
C.V. |
|
|
|
|
11.3 |
Crop
Residue After Planting Winter Wheat,
7 Mar 95, % ground cover
|
Crop |
Rep 1 |
Rep 2 |
Rep 3 |
Rep 4 |
Average |
|
Mustard |
58 |
63 |
61 |
63 |
61 |
|
Pea |
30 |
31 |
29 |
26 |
29 |
|
Lentil |
26 |
27 |
28 |
22 |
26 |
|
LSD (5%) |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
C.V. |
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
1995
Test Weight of Winter Wheat After 1994 Spring Crops, lb/bu
|
Crop |
Rep 1 |
Rep 2 |
Rep 3 |
Rep 4 |
Average |
|
Mustard |
59.3 |
59.4 |
59.8 |
60.5 |
59.7 |
|
Pea |
59.7 |
59.7 |
59.7 |
60.5 |
59.9 |
|
Lentil |
59.8 |
59.5 |
59.9 |
60.7 |
60.0 |
|
LSD (5%) |
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
C.V. |
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
Crop
Residue After Planting Winter Wheat,
3 Apr 95, % ground cover
|
Crop |
Rep 1 |
Rep 2 |
Rep 3 |
Rep 4 |
Average |
|
Mustard |
51 |
60 |
58 |
57 |
56 |
|
Pea |
24 |
22 |
23 |
19 |
22 |
|
Lentil |
21 |
21 |
16 |
16 |
19 |
|
LSD (5%) |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
C.V. |
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
Winter
Wheat Crop Green Growth,
3 Apr 95, % ground cover
|
Crop |
Rep 1 |
Rep 2 |
Rep 3 |
Rep 4 |
Average |
|
Mustard |
12 |
15 |
15 |
19 |
15 |
|
Pea |
11 |
13 |
19 |
19 |
15 |
|
Lentil |
10 |
12 |
15 |
21 |
14 |
|
LSD (5%) |
|
|
|
|
NS |
|
C.V. |
|
|
|
|
11.9 |
Conclusion
Spring crop yields
were very good for the 1994 growing season and these crops produced a
lot of residue. The tillage before planting left only marginal or inadequate
amounts of pea or lentil residue on the surface, but there was good ground
cover following mustard. Residual soil N was low and adequate N was applied
for the winter wheat crop. A companion study with small plots on one end
of the strips had variable fertilizer N rates applied to each OFT plot
and showed a higher yield following legumes than following mustard for
all the N rates. It appears that in this study there was an advantage
for winter wheat yield and test weight to having legumes as a previous
crop compared to mustard.
Dry pea and lentil
residue ground cover was very low following the fall ground preparation
and planting of winter wheat. All ground cover persisted well until the
March sample date when the pea residue cover declined. All cover levels
declined between March and April sample times. However, the crop growth
during this period produced more ground cover than was lost from residue
and therefore there was not a drop in total ground cover. All the residue
materials were more durable than expected across the sampling period.
|
| |

Contact
us: Hans Kok, (208)885-5971
|
Accessibility | Copyright
| Policies | WebStats | STEEP Acknowledgement
Hans Kok, WSU/UI Extension Conservation Tillage Specialist, UI Ag Science
231, PO Box 442339, Moscow, ID 83844 USA Redesigned
by Leila Styer, CAHE Computer Resource Unit; Maintained by Debbie
Marsh, Dept. of Crop & Soil Sciences, WSU
|
|