Oregon State University
Washington State University
University of Idaho
 
On-Farm Testing
 
 
  Return to Rotation Crops and Varieties

Winter Wheat Performance Following Pea, Lentil and Mustard and Residue Durability

Stephen Guy and Robert Gareau
University of Idaho, Plant, Soil and Entomological Sciences

Objectives

  1. Evaluate the influence of previous crops of spring dry pea, lentil and yellow condiment mustard grown in 1994 on the agronomic performance of the following winter wheat crop planted in the fall of 1994 and harvested in 1995.
  2. Evaluate crop residue levels following dry pea, lentil and mustard and determine residue durability over winter.

Location: Genesee, Idaho
Annual precipitation: 20 inches
Rotation: spring barley, spring test crop (pea, lentil or mustard), winter wheat test crop
Variety: 1994 crop: Columbia pea, Crimson lentil, Gisilba mustard; 1995 Madsen WW

Treatment

Dry pea, lentil, or yellow mustard were previous crop treatments before winter wheat.

Comments

The 1994 spring crops were grown using standard production methods of the individual crops. In this case the only input on the mustard was a single wild oat herbicide application. The 1995 winter wheat crop was treated to minimize weed effects and fertilized based on current recommendations from the soil tests and established yield goal. Prior to fall planting, the plot area was fertilized with a ripper-shooter (applying 55 lb N, 30 lb P and 20 lb S per acre), worked twice with a field cultivator, then planted with a double-disk drill. The winter wheat was planted into dry soil in October, but emerged over-winter after rain the beginning of November. Fertilizer ( 70 lb/a of N ) was top dressed in the spring. There was adequate soil moisture available for 1995. At three sites in each plot, post harvest residue was assayed by gathering and weighing residue from a 1' X 8' area (1/2 the combine swath). The estimates of residue ground cover and winter wheat crop green growth were done by three transects with the line-point method. Individual plots were 25' wide and 500' long and each treatment was replicated four times.

Results

1994 Crop Yield, lb/a

Crop Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep 3 Rep 4 Average
Mustard 1133 1484 1830 1542 1497
Pea 3616 3441 3398 2853 3327
Lentil 2518 2439 2875 1451 2321
LSD (5%)         631
C.V.         15.3

1994 Crop Residue After Harvest, lb/a

Crop Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep 3 Rep 4 Average
Mustard 5385 6608 7208 6884 6521
Pea 2074 3742 3574 2003 2848
Lentil 2759 4582 3502 2759 3400
LSD (5%)         962
962         13.1

1994 Crop Residue After Harvest, % ground cover

Crop Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep 3 Rep 4 Average
Mustard 28 41 48 36 38
Pea 50 49 40 47 47
Lentil 50 44 37 41 43
LSD (5%)         NS
C.V.         17.5

1994 Soil S Available 0-1' After Harvest, lb/a

Crop Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep 3 Rep 4 Average
Mustard 16 28 36 20 25
Pea 44 40 44 36 41
Lentil 40 60 36 44 45
LSD (5%)         14
C.V.         22.8

1995 Yield of Winter Wheat After 1994 Spring Crops, bu/a

Crop Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep 3 Rep 4 Average
Mustard 84 93 112 117 101
Pea 98 97 119 124 109
Lentil 101 99 116 122 109
LSD (5%)         6
C.V.         3.1

Crop Residue After Planting Winter Wheat,
18 Oct 94, % ground cover

Crop Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep 3 Rep 4 Average
Mustard 43 67 59 67 59
Pea 35 26 36 33 33
Lentil 31 25 24 24 26
LSD (5%)         15
C.V.         21.7

Crop Residue After Planting Winter Wheat,
1 Dec 94, % ground cover

Crop Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep 3 Rep 4 Average
Mustard 49 66 59 61 59
Pea 35 32 40 28 34
Lentil 29 30 31 20 27
LSD (5%)         10
C.V.         14.4

Crop Residue After Planting Winter Wheat,
9 Feb 95, % ground cover

Crop Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep 3 Rep 4 Average
Mustard 56 65 62 67 62
Pea 37 33 39 28 34
Lentil 29 27 31 22 27
LSD (5%)         8
C.V.         11.3

Crop Residue After Planting Winter Wheat,
7 Mar 95, % ground cover

Crop Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep 3 Rep 4 Average
Mustard 58 63 61 63 61
Pea 30 31 29 26 29
Lentil 26 27 28 22 26
LSD (5%)         4
C.V.         5.4

1995 Test Weight of Winter Wheat After 1994 Spring Crops, lb/bu

Crop Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep 3 Rep 4 Average
Mustard 59.3 59.4 59.8 60.5 59.7
Pea 59.7 59.7 59.7 60.5 59.9
Lentil 59.8 59.5 59.9 60.7 60.0
LSD (5%)         0.2
C.V.         0.2

Crop Residue After Planting Winter Wheat,
3 Apr 95, % ground cover

Crop Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep 3 Rep 4 Average
Mustard 51 60 58 57 56
Pea 24 22 23 19 22
Lentil 21 21 16 16 19
LSD (5%)         6
C.V.         10.3

Winter Wheat Crop Green Growth,
3 Apr 95, % ground cover

Crop Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep 3 Rep 4 Average
Mustard 12 15 15 19 15
Pea 11 13 19 19 15
Lentil 10 12 15 21 14
LSD (5%)         NS
C.V.         11.9

Conclusion

Spring crop yields were very good for the 1994 growing season and these crops produced a lot of residue. The tillage before planting left only marginal or inadequate amounts of pea or lentil residue on the surface, but there was good ground cover following mustard. Residual soil N was low and adequate N was applied for the winter wheat crop. A companion study with small plots on one end of the strips had variable fertilizer N rates applied to each OFT plot and showed a higher yield following legumes than following mustard for all the N rates. It appears that in this study there was an advantage for winter wheat yield and test weight to having legumes as a previous crop compared to mustard.

Dry pea and lentil residue ground cover was very low following the fall ground preparation and planting of winter wheat. All ground cover persisted well until the March sample date when the pea residue cover declined. All cover levels declined between March and April sample times. However, the crop growth during this period produced more ground cover than was lost from residue and therefore there was not a drop in total ground cover. All the residue materials were more durable than expected across the sampling period.

     
 

Contact us: Hans Kok, (208)885-5971 | Accessibility | Copyright | Policies | WebStats | STEEP Acknowledgement
Hans Kok, WSU/UI Extension Conservation Tillage Specialist, UI Ag Science 231, PO Box 442339, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
Redesigned by Leila Styer, CAHE Computer Resource Unit; Maintained by Debbie Marsh, Dept. of Crop & Soil Sciences, WSU