Oregon State University
Washington State University
University of Idaho
 
On-Farm Testing
 
 
  Return to Tillage

Burn/Minimum Till for Continuous Winter Wheat Production

Jay Lyman
with Roland Schirman, Columbia Co. Extension

Objective

To compare burn/minimum till versus standard fall tillage for continuous winter wheat production.

Location: Dayton, WA
Annual precipitation: 22 iinches
Soil: Athena silt loam
Rotation: Winter wheat

Treatments

Conventional tillage
Burn/minimum till

Comments

Tillage plots were reestablished over 1993-94 plots prior to September field burn. Fertilizer was applied cross-slope at 80 lb/A with a heavy duty applicator. Madsen winter wheat was seeded using conventional double disk drills. Lateness of fall rain delayed emergence beyond normal date for this location. Heavy rain on frozen soil occurred December 31-January 1. Drought conditions prevailed during the growing season.

Data

Wheat yield, bu/ac

Treatment Rep 1 Rep 2 Average
Burn 26.3 23.1 24.7a
Till 20.0 19.3 19.7a
LSD (5%)     15.9
CV     5.6%

Soil Analysis, 24 Aug 94

  Organic Matter Avail. Water Avail. Nitrogen
% inches lb/ac
Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep 1 Rep 2
Burn 2.11 2.18 1.28 2.03 63 86
Till 2.07 2.31 2.12 3.19 57 77

Conclusion

Although not statistically significant, a trend toward higher yield was observed in the burn/minimum till treatment. Seed production of downy brome was much greater in the tillage plots. No differences in soil organic matter levels could be measured. A trend toward better moisture extraction and nitrogen utilization was also seen.

     
 

Contact us: Hans Kok, (208)885-5971 | Accessibility | Copyright | Policies | WebStats | STEEP Acknowledgement
Hans Kok, WSU/UI Extension Conservation Tillage Specialist, UI Ag Science 231, PO Box 442339, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
Redesigned by Leila Styer, CAHE Computer Resource Unit; Maintained by Debbie Marsh, Dept. of Crop & Soil Sciences, WSU