Soil Biology in the Key to Healthy Soil and the Direct-Seeding Advantage
Dr. Jill Clapperton1 and Dr. Megan Ryan2
Ecology Research Group, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
"A soil is not
a pile of dirt. It is a transformer, a body that organises raw materials
into tissues. These are the tissues that become the mother to all organic
When we are standing
on the ground, we are really standing on the roof-top of another world.
Living in the soil are plant roots, viruses, bacteria, fungi, algae, protozoa,
mites, nematodes, worms, ants, maggots and other insects and insect larvae
(grubs), and larger animals. Indeed, the volume of living organisms below
ground is often far greater than that above ground. Together with climate,
these organisms are responsible for the decay of organic matter and cycling
of both macro- and micro-nutrients back into forms that plants can use.
Microorganisms like fungi and bacteria use the carbon, nitrogen, and other
nutrients in organic matter. Microscopic soil animals like protozoa, amoebae,
nematodes, and mites feed on the organic matter, fungi, bacteria, and
each other. Together, these activities stabilise soil aggregates building
a better soil habitat and improving soil structure, tilth and productivity.
Agricultural practices such as crop rotations and tillage affect the numbers,
diversity, and functioning of the micro- and larger-organisms in the soil
community, which in turn affects the establishment, growth, and nutrient
content of the crops we grow. We have all heard our mothers and fathers
say "you are what you eat". Farming practices that include diversified
crop rotations, increased use of legumes, cover crops, green manures,
composts, and intercropping build soil organic matter content, and increase
the biodiversity of soil organisms.
In this presentation you will be introduced to the activities of soil organisms (both micro and macro in size) in terms of how they affect the cycling and availability of nutrients to crops, disease cycles, weed management, and soil tilth and erosion potential. More detailed examples with VAM fungi and earthworms will demonstrate the important role of soil biology in improving soil quality and productivity. To complete the picture, the presentation finishes with a discussion of how biological activity is influenced by soil management practices, and point to ways that we can better manage and use soil biological activity to our advantage.
Soils are formed
from a stew of geological ingredients or parent materials (rocks and minerals),
water, and billions of organisms. The interactions between climate, parent
material, organisms, landscape, and time affect all major ecosystem processes
which leads to the development of soil properties that are unique to that
soil type and climate. The activities of and chemicals produced by, soil
micoorganisms, and the chemicals leached from plant residues and roots
can further influence the weathering of parent materials changing the
mineral nutrient content and structure of soil. Thus, farm management
practices such as crop rotations, tillage, fallow, irrigation, and nutrient
inputs can all affect the population and diversity of soil organisms,
and in turn, soil quality.
There are three soil
properties that define soil quality: chemical, physical and biological.
The chemical properties of a soil are usually related to soil fertility
such as available nitrogen (N) phosphorus (P) potassium (K), micronutrient
uptake of Cu, Zn, Mn, and etc, as well as organic matter content (SOM)
and pH. Soil structural characteristics such as aggregate formation and
stability, tilth, and texture are physical properties. The biological
properties of a soil unite the soil physical and chemical properties.
For instance, fungi and bacteria recycle all the carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus,
sulphur and other nutrients in SOM, including animal residues, into the
mineral forms that can be used by plants. By breaking down the complex
carbon compounds that make up SOM into simpler compounds, soil organisms
acquire their energy.
At the same time,
the root exudates, hyphae of the fungi and the secretions and waste products
of the bacteria are binding small soil particles and organic matter together
to improve soil structure. This makes a better soil habitat that attracts
more soil animals, which further increases the amount of nutrient cycling.
Faecal pellets from soil invertebrates and castings from earthworms increase
the number of larger sized soil aggregates, allowing for more water infiltration,
aeration and better rooting. The activities of soil animals mix smaller
organic matter particles deeper into the soil acting to increase the water
holding capacity of the soil. Thus, biological activities hold the key
to maintaining or increasing soil productivity.
is mostly measured in terms of yield (Brady, 1974), and is a function
of soil structure, fertility, and the population, species composition,
and activities of soil organisms. We further suggest that health, nutrient
content and value of the crops, and environmental quality both on and
off the farm should also be considered as a measure of soil productivity.
Studies have shown that soil bacteria and fungi regulate the destruction
of toxic environmental pollutants like nitrous oxides and methane (greenhouse
gases), and some pesticides. The speed at which residues decay and nutrients
are released from SOM, and pollutants and pesticides are detoxified, will
in turn be largely dependent on how we manage the soil.
Farm management practices, and the effect they have on soil organisms will also influence the processes that determine the health of our environment on a broader scale. Soil erosion or leaching of soluble nutrients contributes towards the contamination of rivers with nutrients (eutrophication). For instance, the nitrogen from incorporated residues is released and readily leached by rain and melt water making its way into surface and ground water. Incorporating nitrogen rich green manures into the soil using tillage in the summer or fall and then leaving these residues until the following spring may therefore affect eutrophication. Residues left on the surface initially release more atmospheric emissions than incorporated residues but are less subject to leaching, releasing nutrients more gradually. Soils are also less likely to erode when residues are retained. Drinkwater et al. (1998) suggested that using low carbon to nitrogen residues like those used in organic legume-based cropping systems to maintain soil fertility, when combined with more diverse cropping rotations can increase the amount of carbon and nitrogen that is retained in the soil. This could have positive effects on regional and global carbon and nitrogen budgets, sustained productivity, and environmental quality.
I. The Rhizosphere
In undisturbed soil,
most of the nutrient cycling, roots, and biological activity are found
in the top 20 to 30 cm, called the rooting zone. The rhizosphere is characterised
as a zone of intense microbial activity, and represents a close relationship
between the plant, soil and soil organisms.
The rhizosphere is
bathed in energy-rich carbon compounds, the products of plant photosynthesis,
which have leaked from the roots. These include sugars, amino acids and
organic acids and are called root exudates. Every plant species leaks
a unique signature of compounds from their roots. The quantity and quality
of these compounds depends to a certain extent on the soil chemical and
physical properties, but in all cases determines the microbial community
of the rhizosphere. Symbionts like the bacteria Rhizobium that fix nitrogen
in legumes, and disease-causing pathogens, may be particularly well tuned
to the composition and quantity of root exudates and be attracted to a
particular plant. This means that it is also important to carefully match
legume crop species with the appropriate commercial microbial inoculants.
More generally, bacteria
and fungi use root exudates and the dead sloughed cells from the root
to grow and reproduce, but competition for a space on or near the root
is stiff. In the battle for carbon compounds, bacteria often produce antibiotics
and poisonous chemicals and gases that remove the competition (which on
occasion can also reduce plant growth), and/or plant growth promoting
substances that increase root growth, the amount of root area available
for colonisation, and root exudates. The sticky secretions from the bacteria
in combination with exudates and dead and decaying root cells create tiny
soil aggregates and a habitat for scavenging and predator protozoa, nematodes
and mites that feed on the large numbers of bacteria and fungi. In turn,
the faecal pellets from these microscopic animals add to the structure
of soil and are a rich source of nutrients for bacteria and fungi, and
plants. For instance, in greenhouse studies, plants grown in soil with
added bacterial- and fungal- feeding nematodes had more shoot growth and
a higher yield than plants grown in soil without the nematodes. Mega fauna
like earthworms feed in the nutrient rich matrix around the rhizosphere
consuming large quantities of dead plant material, fungi, protozoa and
bacteria. The castings left by earthworms are rich in available nitrogen
for plants and bind and stabilise smaller soil particles into larger aggregates
improving soil fertility and structure. Plant roots can move easily through
earthworm channels allowing the plant to take advantage of the available
nitrogen that lines earthworm burrows. The sticky secretions and webs
of fungal hyphae bind smaller soil particles, like those formed by bacteria,
into larger aggregates further improving soil structure.
In review, the rhizosphere
is a partnership between the plant, soil and soil organisms. Plants provide
the carbon food source for soil organisms that bind the soil particles
into aggregates and recycle soil nutrients, and soil provides the habitat,
water, and mineral nutrients for both soil organisms and plants. This
means that any factor or soil management technique that changes the amount
and quality of carbon going into the soil, as either residue or root exudates,
will effect change in the soil biological community. Understanding and
then managing rhizosphere processes could have far-reaching advantages
in agriculture in terms of increasing plant growth and nutrient uptake
and soil habitat structure and health, and reducing the environmental
consequences of agriculture.
II. The Rhizosphere
and Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhizal (VAM) Fungi
VAM fungi probably
form the most intimate relationship between the plant, soil and soil organisms,
best illustrating the potential for using rhizosphere processes to improve
soil quality and productivity. VAM fungi form a mutually beneficial or
symbiotic relationship with 80 percent of all land plants, including warm-
and cool-season cereals, pulses, forages, and some oilseeds. They appear
to be essential to the establishment, growth and survival of many plant
species. For instance, VAM fungi are critical in the early establishment
and growth most cereals and particularly warm season grasses like maize,
sweet corn, and sorghum. They are also important for early establishment
and growth of some non-cereal crops like sunflower, flax, and potatoes.
VAM fungi penetrate
the cells of the root without harming the plant. From the root, the microscopic
hyphae extend like a network of silk threads through the bulk soil. VAM
fungi can be considered a highly effective transport system, like a pipeline,
between the soil and the plant, moving water and nutrients to the plant
in exchange for direct access to the carbon-rich products of photosynthesis.
VAM fungi are most well known for their ability to increase the uptake
and plant content of less available mineral nutrients such as phosphorus
(P), calcium (Ca), zinc (Zn), and copper (Cu). For instance, increasing
colonisation by VAM fungi can in turn increase the mineral nutrient content
of wheat (Clapperton et al., 1997a). The degree to which a particular
plant relies on VAM for access to nutrients is termed its level of dependency.
Highly dependent crops often have limited root systems, with thick roots
and few root hairs. Less dependent plants will have larger fibrous root
systems that are well adapted to competing for nutrients. Even less dependent
plant species may rely on VAM fungi when under environmental stresses
such as drought. VAM fungi are also known to increase resistance of the
plant host to root diseases. VAM hyphae will tie and glomulin secreted
by the hyphae glue soil particles into more erosion-resistant aggregates.
Once plant roots
are colonised by VAM fungi, their physiology and biochemistry change.
They have higher rates of photosynthesis, better water use efficiency,
and move more and different kinds of carbon compounds to the roots. Consequently,
there is a different rhizosphere community associated with the roots of
VAM-colonised plants; a rhizosphere with fewer pathogens, more nitrifiers,
and other changes that we still don't know about (nitrifying bacteria
convert ammonia to nitrate, which is easier for the plant to absorb).
The degree of colonisation by VAM fungi and the benefits of having plants colonised by VAM fungi can be reduced by tillage and incompatible crops in rotation including non-mycorrhizal host plants, such as canola (Table 2). Although, populations of soil fauna like earthworms and nematodes tend to increase under canola. The addition of fertilisers containing easily soluble phosphorus, including non-composted manure, will greatly reduce VAM colonisation.
Populations of VAM fungi can be rebuilt under reduced tillage by using only the required amount of composted manure or poorly soluble phosphorus fertilisers such as rock phosphate. Furthermore, including pasture and perennial crop phases, legumes, and other highly dependent crops such as maize, sorghum, flax and sunflower in the rotation can dramatically increase populations and networks of VAM fungi. Research has shown that some species of VAM fungi can promote growth in one crop and inhibit it in another in two and three phase rotations. This is another demonstration of how important soil biodiversity is to creating flexible cropping systems. The interaction between crop rotation, VAM fungi, soil animals, and plant establishment and growth needs more research so we can take better advantage of the benefits that VAM fungi confer on some crops.
are soil mega fauna
The presence of earthworms
in the soil is often considered to be a positive indicator of soil quality
and productivity. Earthworm numbers increase dramatically with no tillage
and in undisturbed systems. The burrowing activities of earthworms increase
soil aeration, water infiltration, nitrogen availability to plants, and
the microbial activity in the soil. The lining of the earthworm burrow
(also known as the drilosphere) has been found to have higher populations
of nitrifying bacteria than the soil outside the burrow. The increased
nitrogen available in the drilosphere may be another reason why roots
often grow in earthworm channels. Earthworm burrows can be stable for
years, acting to increase the extent and density of plant roots as well
as stabilising soil aggregates to improve soil structure and limit erosion.
It has been suggested by a number of researchers that earthworms are major
contributors to the breakdown of organic matter and N cycling in reduced
tillage systems. Earthworms prefer plant material that has been colonised
by fungi and bacteria, which can lead to the reduced incidence of fungal
diseases in crops. Indeed, earthworms are probably most important in reduced
tillage systems, not only because these systems encourage earthworm populations
but, because without mechanical mixing and loosening, earthworm casts
and burrows are left intact to encourage better root development. In long-term
dryland tillage experiments at the Lethbridge Research Centre, we have
found as many as 300 earthworms per square meter under no tillage compared
with none under conventional tillage (Clapperton et al., 1997b). In this
same field experiment there was a significantly lower incidence of common
root rot under no tillage compared with conventional tillage, demonstrating
the long-term benefit of maintaining the soil habitat. In Australia, the
same earthworm species that are common in Canada were found to increase
perennial pasture productivity by 30 percent over pastures without earthworms
(Baker et al., 1999).
Earthworm populations can be increased by reduced tillage in combination with crop rotation. Introducing earthworms into soil is not recommended because scientists in Canada presently understand very little about the ecology of the more than 25 species of earthworms that have been identified. The earthworms (Eisenia foetida or red wigglers) used for vermicomposting are not native to Canada neither are they earth-working earthworms and therefore are not appropriate for field agriculture. The dew worm or night crawler (Lumbricus terrestris) used for bait is not appropriate for introduction into Prairie soils because it deposits casts containing high amounts of clay on the soil surface that when unmulched can create a clay hard-pan and problems with surface water erosion. The fastest way to increase earthworm populations is by reducing soil disturbance, and direct-seeding crops for as many years in a row as possible, and/or including perennial crops and/or pasture into the rotation. You can further increase earthworm populations by adding oilseeds and retaining legumes in the rotation under no tillage. There are more and bigger earthworms under no tillage after oilseed (particularly flax and canola), and legume crops compared with cereals (Clapperton and Lee, 1998).
Soil management is
defined by Nyle Brady (1984) as the sum of all tillage operations, cropping
practices, fertilizer, soil amendments, and other treatments applied to
the soil for the production of plants. Once again, the emphasis is on
the interconnectedness between all farming practices and the soil.
that affect the placement and incorporation of residues like tillage can
make it harder or easier for the soil organisms responsible for cycling
nutrients. Tillage directly affects soil porosity and the placement of
residues. Porosity determines the amount of air and water the soil can
hold. Placement of residues affects the soil surface temperature, rate
of evaporation and water content, and nutrient loading and rate of decay.
In other words, tillage collapses the pores and tunnels that were constructed
by soil animals, and changes the water holding, gas, and nutrient exchange
capacities of the soil. Reduced tillage and particularly no tillage reduce
soil disturbance, increase organic matter content, improve soil structure,
buffer soil temperatures, and allow soil to catch and hold more melt and
rain water. No tillage soils are more biologically active and biologically
diverse, have higher nutrient loading capacities, release nutrients gradually
and continuously, and have better soil structure than reduced or cultivated
No tillage dramatically
increases the population and diversity of soil animals, particularly soil
mites that feed on fungi. Under no tillage, litter or residue is primarily
decomposed by fungi that accumulate nitrogen in their hyphae, in response
the population of fungal feeding mites increases rapidly, using some of
the nitrogen from the fungi and releasing the remainder into the soil
to be used by plants and other organisms. No tillage systems and rotations
with perennial crops or pasture show greater resilience (they can recover
faster after disturbances such as drought, flood or tillage). The populations
and species diversity of soil animals are higher, there is more SOM, and
nitrogen is recycled into the system at a greater rate compared with conventionally
Higher organic matter
content of soils from using no tillage and rotations, and/or the direct
applications of manure or composts may reduce disease. Many of the soil
organisms that are rapid colonisers of organic matter are antagonistic
to disease-causing organisms. For instance, in agricultural trial plots,
Sivapalan et al. (1993) found a number of soil-borne fungi that cause
root diseases, including Rhizoctonia solani, only on conventional vegetable
plots. Fungi that are antagonistic to such disease-causing fungi, such
as Trichoderma and Penicillium, were found more frequently in the organic
pots, where 80-120 tonnes per hectare of compost had been applied.
Residues from some crops inhibit the growth of other plants either directly, or indirectly, from the by-products produced from the microbial decay of the residues (allelopathy). Fall rye, mustard, oats, George Black medic, hairy vetch, sunflower, oil seed hemp, and sweet clover have all been reported to inhibit the growth of weeds. All these crops will also increase populations of VAM fungi.
The benefits of diversified
crop rotations married together with reduced tillage and especially no
tillage can dramatically increase soil productivity while reducing off-farm
costs. Low residue crops like peas, lentils, mustard, tomatoes, dry beans
or canola can be rotated with higher residue cereals to reduce the trash
loading. Rotating cereals and oilseeds with peas, forages, or underseeding
cereals with annual or biennial legumes, which fix nitrogen, increase
the amount of nitrogen available to plants in the cropping systems. The
bacteria associated with legumes take N directly from the air, a process
that obviously does not require the large amounts of fossil fuels like
the manufacturing of commercial nitrogenous fertilisers. The residual
benefits of nitrogen from these crops can be persistent for a number of
years depending on the legume. Note that legumes are dependent on two
symbionts, a nitrogen-fixing bacterium like Rhizobium as well as VAM fungi
to supply the increased phosphorus required to more efficiently fix nitrogen.
They also establish and grow well in biologically active soils while acting
to build more biologically active soils. Cover cropped soil has been shown
to have the largest and most diverse populations of microorganisms, compared
with manure amended plots that had had a less diverse but more metabolically
active population of microorganisms (Wander et al., 1995).
Soils after pasture phases and perennial crops are more structured and biologically active, have higher organic matter content, and turnover nitrogen more rapidly. Including a deep-rooted legume like alfalfa or lucerne can help increase the rate of nitrogen cycling and reduce plow layer compaction. Mixed- and inter-cropping systems increase aboveground diversity which in turn increases diversity in the below ground community. Scientists and farmers alike speculate that a more diverse soil community results in a more flexible soil. This means a soil that has the ability to successfully grow a number of crops, and which is resilient in drought, low nutrient conditions, and after disturbance.
Creating a soil habitat
is the first step to managing soil biological properties for long-term
soil quality and productivity. This means using soil management practices
that reduce soil disturbance, managing weeds and disease with crop rotation,
mixed cropping, and underseeding, and using high quality compost and composted
manure. For instance, unstructured soils with low organic matter content
that have fine aggregates or clay within the plow layer will take between
3-5 years to build the soil biological properties necessary to improve
soil structure and stability depending on climate and previous soil management.
It is better to start the transition to a conservation tillage system
after a perennial crop or pasture phase of 2-5 years. As an added bonus,
conservation tillage and having pasture and perennial crops phases in
the rotation uses less fossil fuel, and with less time on the tractor,
producers have more time to consider farm management details that will
improve the biological activity of soil. It is generally understood that
the soil biological community benefits soil productivity, yet we know
so little about the organisms that live in the soil and the functioning
of the soil ecosystem. Continued research aimed at understanding the interactions
between soil management practices and the soil biological, chemical and
physical properties of soil will be the key to sustaining the soil, environment
and our future generations.
We wrote this paper to increase awareness among producers that soils are living, breathing, and ever changing, and that the potential exists to manage and use soil properties more effectively for producing nutritious food at less environmental cost. We invite you to use the fundamental and basic information we have provided to further experiment with crop rotations, green manures, inter- and mixed- cropping, conservation tillage, and integrated livestock grazing, and develop your own unique soil ecosystem.
We thank all the producers who have patiently listened to us and then taken time to lead us through the art and science of farming. Jill Clapperton is a Rhizosphere Ecologist with Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada and funded through the Lethbridge Research Centre. Megan Ryan is a post-doctoral research fellow at CSIRO Plant Industry, funded by the GRDC.
Baker, G.H., Carter,
P.J., and Barrett, V.J. 1999. Influence of earthworms, Aporrectodea spp.
(Lumbricidae), on pasture production in south -eastern Australia. Australian
Journal of Agricultural Research, 50: 1247-1257.
Beare, M.H. 1997.
Fungal and bacterial pathways of organic matter decomposition and nitrogen
mineralization in arable soils. In- Brussaard, L. and Ferrera-Cerrato,
R. (Eds.), Soil Ecology in Sustainable Agricultural Systems, CRC Press,
Boca Raton USA, pp. 37-70.
Brady, N.C. 1974.
The Nature and Properties of Soils. MacMillan Publishing Co., Inc. New
Janzen,H.H., and Johnston, A.M. 1997a. Suppression of VAM fungi and micronutrient
uptake by low-level P fertilisation in long-term wheat rotations. American
Journal of alternative Agriculture, 12:59-63.
Clapperton , M.J.,
Miller, J.J., Larney, F.J., and Lindwall, C.W. 1997b. Earthworm populations
as affected by long-term tillage practices in southern Alberta, Canada.
Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 29: 631-633.
and Lee, N.O. 1998. Farming for Earthworms, AAFC, Lethbridge Research
Centre, Lethbridge AB. Extension publication.
Coleman, D.C. and
Crossley, Jr., D.A. 1996. Fundamentals of Soil Ecology. Academic Press,
Wagoner, P., and Sarrantonio,M. 1998. Legume-based cropping systems have
reduced carbon and nitrogen losses. Nature, 396: 262-265.
Hoffman, C.A., and
Carroll, C.R. 1995. Can we sustain the biological basis of agriculture?
Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26, 69-92.
Logan, W.R. 1995.
Dirt: The ecstatic skin of the earth. Riverhead Books, New York.
Ryan, M. H. 1998. The Ecology of VAM Fungi in Contrasting Australian Agricultural Systems. PhD thesis. Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Swift, M.H. 1994.
Maintaining the biological status of soil: a key to sustainable land management.
In- Greenland, D.J., and Szabolcs, I. (Eds.), Soil Resilience and Sustainable
Land Use, CAB International, Wallingford UK, pp. 33-39.
Wander , M.N., Hedrick, D.S., Kaufman, D., Traina, S.J., Stinner, B.R., Kehrmeyer, S.R., and White, D.C. 1995. The functional significance of the microbial biomass in organic and conventionally managed soils. Plant and Soil, 170: 87-97.
Biodiversity in Agroecosystems.
W. W Collins and C.O. Qualset (Eds). CRC Press Boca Raton USA.
1997. Weeds, the rhizosphere and the underground story. In: Weeds as Teachers,
S.K. Hilander (Ed.), AERO, Helena, Montana, USA.
Doran, J.W. and Linn,
D.M. 1994. Microbial ecology for conservation management systems. In:
Advances in Soil Science, Soil Biology: Effects on Soil Quality, J.L.
Hatfield and B.A. Stewart (Eds.). Lewis Publishers Boca Raton. Pp. 1-29.
Defining Soil Quality
for a Sustainable Environment. Soil Science Society of America Special
Publication 35, J.W. Doran, D.C. Coleman, D.F. Bezdicek, and B.A. Stewart
(Eds.). Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Agronomy Society of America,
Inc. Madison, Wisconsin.
and Biogeography in North America, 1995. Paul F. Hendrix, (Ed.). Lewis
Publishers, Boca Raton, USA.
Lavelle, P. 2000.
Ecological challenges for soil science. Soil Science 165, 73-86.
Ryan, M. H. 1999.
Is an enhanced soil biological community, relative to conventional neighbours,
a consistent feature of alternative (organic and biodynamic) agricultural
systems? Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 17: 131-144.
Soule, J.D. and Piper,
J.K. 1992. Farming in Natures Image: An Ecological Approach to Agriculture,
Island Press, Washington D.C.
Zero Tillage: Advancing the Art. 1997. D. Domitruk, B. Crabtree, G.R. Coutts, and R.K. Smith (Eds.). Manitoba-North Dakota Zero Tillage Farmers Association.
us: Hans Kok, (208)885-5971
Accessibility | Copyright
| Policies | WebStats | STEEP Acknowledgement