Oregon State University
Washington State University
University of Idaho
 
Research Reports
 
 
  1999 Table of Contents

1999 STEEP III Progress Report

RESEARCH PROJECT TITLE:

Managing the Economic Transition to No-Till Farming in the Pacific Northwest

INVESTIGATORS:

Douglas Young (Co-PI), Hong Wang (Co-PI), Department of Agricultural Economics, WSU. Cooperators are Herbert Hinman, Department of Agricultural Economics, WSU; Dennis Roe, USDA-NRCS; Dave Bezdicek, Tim Fiez, Eric Gallandt, Robert Papendick, William Schillinger, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, WSU; Dave Huggins, Keith Saxton, Frank Young, USDA-ARS, Pullman; Roger Veseth, STEEP Extension Specialist, UI/WSU.

INTERIM REPORT:

OBJECTIVES:

  1. To identify appropriate economic strategies for PNW farmers in different business and agro-climatic situations to successfully manage financial risk and to maintain acceptable economic returns during the transition to no-till farming.
  2. To disseminate the results on efficient strategies for managing no-till adoption risk to growers, policy makers and others through extension bulletins, other publications, talks at field days and other meetings, and through other media.

KEY WORDS: No-till, transition, risk, economics

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM:

USDA reports that the Pacific Region, including the Pacific Northwest (PNW), seriously lags the rest of the country in adoption of no-till farming. Furthermore, many early adopters of no-till in the PNW subsequently abandoned the practice in part due to difficulties in managing the large up-front costs of purchasing no-till drills and appropriate tractors. These large investment costs and attendant financial risks have been a major barrier to nonadopters of no-till. These barriers have been magnified by the extremely low crop prices, declining farm program payments, and depressed markets for used conventional farm machinery during the late 1990's. Indeed a recent series of economic case studies of PNW no-till farmers by the investigators have shown wide variation in their economic success depending on how the financial transition to no-till was managed. The timing of machinery purchases, purchase of new or used machinery, custom hiring of some operations, renting or leasing machinery, management of repair and retooling costs, and combinations of these approaches must be strategically tailored to the particular farm business situation. A better understanding of the nature of the risks and returns for different no-till transition strategies could lead to public policies and programs which would accelerate adoption of no-till where it is suitable, and thereby reduce the economic and environmental losses from soil erosion in the PNW.

ZONE OF INTEREST:

PNW dryland agro-climatic zones with 8" to 22" av. ppt/yr.

ABSTRACT OF RESEARCH FINDINGS:

This is a new project with actual funding arriving in mid-1999. A graduate student will not be assigned to this project until year 2000. While no results have been obtained to date, data collection and methodology development have started. We have assembled information on the strategies used for transition to no-till by 11 successful long term no-till farmers from Oregon, Washington, and Idaho who were studied in a previous STEEP project. A wide variety of transition strategies--all aimed at economizing machinery costs--were observed among this group. Some sample strategies include doing custom no-till planting to help pay for no-till drills, beginning no-till on a limited part of the farm using custom drilling or rental drills, renting larger tractors needed only for the drilling operation, buying used drills and retrofitting them, constructing or assembling no-till drills in farm shops, sharing no-till drills and tractors with relatives of neighbors, minimizing drill and tractor repair costs by doing these on the farm, timing purchases of drills and tractors during high cash flow years, and shopping for low cost financing for drill and tractor purchases. Interestingly only one of these successful no-till growers reported having disposed of all his conventional tillage equipment. Most reported they had retained this equipment as a hedge in case they needed to return to conventional tillage. They also reported that the market for plows and other conventional tillage implements was currently so depressed that it did not pay to sell this machinery.

We have also begun reviewing the pertinent financial risk management literature and have assembled some farm management software for measuring the long run profitability of buy, lease, custom, or rent stategies for acquisition of farm machinery.

RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION:

Objective 1. To identify economic strategies for PNW farmers to successfully manage financial risk during the transition to no-till farming.

See Abstract above.

Objective 2. To disseminate results.

None.

INTERACTION (COOPERATION) WITH OTHER SCIENTISTS CONDUCTING RELATED ACTIVITY:

We conferred with WSU Crop and Soil Sciences faculty, USDA-ARS scientists, and NRCS personnel listed as Cooperators in the selection of no-till farmers. We have also conferred with other farm management economists on procedures for simulating different machinery investment strategies over time with realistic yield and price variation.

PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS:

None.

     
 

Contact us: Hans Kok, (208)885-5971 | Accessibility | Copyright | Policies | WebStats | STEEP Acknowledgement
Hans Kok, WSU/UI Extension Conservation Tillage Specialist, UI Ag Science 231, PO Box 442339, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
Redesigned by Leila Styer, CAHE Computer Resource Unit; Maintained by Debbie Marsh, Dept. of Crop & Soil Sciences, WSU