Oregon State University
Washington State University
University of Idaho
 
Direct Seed Conferences
 
 
  2002 Table of Contents

Impacts and Management of Soil Acidity under Direct Seed Systems
- Strategies for Management

Greg Schwab, David Bezdicek, Ian Wildey, and Mary Fauci
Washington State University, Pullman

Introduction

Decreasing soil pH of agricultural land in the Pacific Northwest (PNW) as a result of nitrogen fertilizer applications has been well documented (Mahler et al, 1985). In the majority of the country, management of acid soils is simply applying the recommended rate of agricultural limestone every four to six years. In the Palouse, the cost of limestone is so high that alternative management strategies can be cost effective. In direct-seed cropping systems, acid soil is a greater problem because lime must be leached into the profile rather than using primary tillage for mixing. For these reasons, it is especially important that growers here in the PNW limit inputs of acidity through crop and fertilizer management techniques and thereby reduce the need for lime. To effectively manage soil pH, one must first have a basic understanding of soil pH and a thorough understanding of the factors causing soil acidity. Then this knowledge can be applied to growers' unique cropping systems.

Soil pH

There is an inverse relationship between soil pH and acidity; the lower the soil pH the more acid the soil. Soil pH is important because the availability of nutrients essential for plant growth as well as elements toxic to plant growth are directly related to pH (Figure 1). For example, phosphorus availability decreases dramatically from pH 6.0 to 5.0 because of the formation of insoluble iron and aluminum complexes. Conversely, the availability of soluble aluminum, which is toxic to plant roots, increases as soil pH decreases. Most agricultural crops have maximum yield when soil pH is between 5.5 and 7.0, while some crops like wheat can tolerate soil pH as low as 5.2. There are many factors that contribute to increasing soil acidity. For most agricultural systems, nitrogen fertilization (also some phosphorus and sulfur fertilizers) and nitrogen fixation account for the majority of the acidity produced in a given growing season. Other factors include removal of basic cations (calcium, potassium, and magnesium) with the harvested portion of the crop, as well as, cation losses associated with nitrate leaching. In conventional tillage cropping systems, the acidity produced is uniformly mixed into the surface layer during the primary tillage operation. In a direct-seed cropping system, however, horizontal layers of acid soil are formed as a result of acid deposition from fertilizer placement and plant growth. Because there is no primary tillage, the acidity of this layer builds with successive years of direct-seeding and eventually will begin to affect plant growth. There are two ways to manage acid soils: (1) reduce the amount of acid (hydrogen ions) being added to the system and (2) apply lime to neutralize acidity and thus increase soil pH.

Reduction of Acid Inputs

Fertilizers that contain ammonium (NH4+) or N that is converted to ammonium (like anhydrous ammonia or urea) after application are considered acid forming. The acid is produced when the NH4 is converted to NO3 by soil microbes (as discussed in the previous paper). In addition to nitrogen fertilizers, some phosphorus and sulfur fertilizers also form acid when applied. Because there are many different fertilizer formulations, a wide range in resulting acidity or basicity exists (Table 1). By selecting a fertilizer that produce less acidity, the grower can reduce the need for future lime application. For example, anhydrous ammonia (82-0-0) and aqua ammonia (20-0-0) are the main nitrogen fertilizers used for wheat production in the Pacific northwest, because of their low price and high percentage of nitrogen per unit weight. Phosphorus and sulfur are commonly applied as a starter of ammonium-phosphate-sulfate (16-20-0). In the high precipitation zone, growers planting direct seeded wheat commonly apply 100 lbs/a as 82-0-0 and 16 lbs/a as 16-20-0. This fertilizer combination requires approximately 300 lbs/a of pure CaCO3 yearly to completely neutralize the hydrogen ions produced (Mortvedt et al., 1999). If a combination of UAN (urea ammonium nitrate, 32-0-0) was used for N instead of anhydrous and a mixture of triple superphosphate and potassium sulfate was used as the starter, then the fertilizer acid addition would have only required 90 lbs of CaCO3 for neutralization. In addition to fertilizer formulation, the fertilizer requirement of the crop produced has a large impact on the acid inputs.

Table 1

Because of the price premium for the hard red wheat classes, many growers are choosing this market class over the more traditional soft white market class. Hard red wheat generally requires 1 additional pound of N per bushel to obtain the desired 14% protein. Depending on N source, this could amount to an acid input requiring an additional 180 lbs of CaCO3 for neutralization. In a conventional tillage system, this acidity would be mixed into the entire plow layer and its effects would be buffered by the bulk soil, but in the direct seeding system, the acidity remains in the seed zone and builds year after year. In the high rainfall region, soils with pH below 4.8 (in the 2-4 inch layer) have been observed in many fields with a history of direct seeding and/or a history of high N application rates. On the 160 acre Cunningham Research Farm near Pullman, 185 soil samples were collected to access the soil variability of a typical Palouse landscape (Figure 2). The field has a history of continuous cereal cropping and direct seeding. Results indicate more than 40% of the samples collected had soil pH (in the 2-4 inch layer) below the critical level for wheat (pH 5.2) established by Mahler and McDole (1987).

Figure 2
Figure 2. Soil pH distribution at the 0-2, 2-4, and 4-6 inch depths for samples collected on the Cunningham Farm.

In addition to fertilizer applications, the plant itself can also have an effect on soil pH. As a plant absorbs nutrients from the soil solution, it maintains electroneutrality by releasing H+ (acid) when cations like NH4, Ca, K, and Mg are absorbed and releasing HCO3- (base) when anions like NO3 and Cl are absorbed. Researchers have found that this mechanism is important in the uptake of some micronutrients, but under field conditions it has little effect on the soil pH because the total uptake of cations and anions is nearly balanced (Barber, 1995).

Correcting Acid Soils

Applications of CaCO3 and/or MgCO3 are used to raise soil pH. In most parts of the US, lime is applied at a rate high enough to raise soil pH near neutral (pH 7) once every 4-6 years. The application rate (typically 2-4 tons/acre) depends on type and amount of clay in the soil, as well as the amount of organic matter in the soil. For this reason, lime application rate should always be determined based on a soil analysis. Because of the cost of limestone in the PNW and problems associated with spreading that amount of material, large scale lime application might not be feasible here. An alternative application method would be to apply enough lime to neutralize the acidity produced by the current years fertilizer application. With this approach, lime could be placed in direct seed contact using the drill at the time of planting, thus avoiding the need for tillage to incorporate the lime. For direct seed cropping systems, seed placed lime is the ideal placement because of the high seed zone acidity. Results from the first year of a study conducted near Palouse, WA show that seed placed increased soil pH in the seed zone for at least one treatment (Figure 3). A STEEP funded project has been initiated this year to examine the long-term effectiveness of seed placed lime in direct seeding cropping systems.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Effect of pelletized lime (P lime) and pelletized sugar beet by-product (SB lime) applied at rates of 100 and 200 lbs CCE/acre on soil pH with depth.

Liming materials vary in their neutralizing capacity. For this reason, CaCO3 equivalent (CCE) is used to compare the effectiveness of liming materials (much like a fertilizer analysis is used to compare different N sources). Agricultural limestone generally has a CCE of 65-75%, but products with CCE of over 90% are available. In addition to agricultural lime, some byproducts also make good liming agents and can be less expensive. High quality lime is used in the processing of sugar beets and drinking water, so in some areas this is a readily available source. As with agricultural lime, an analysis of the material is needed to determine the cost effectiveness. These by-products are often fluid suspensions, so the amount of water in the material should also be considered. Another form of lime that is available in the PNW is pelletized lime. Pelletized lime is made by mixing a binding agent with finely powdered limestone in order to ease handling and to assure a more uniform application. Because the binding agent readily breaks down when mixed with water, the CCE of the pelletized lime is the same as the powdered material used to make it.

Conclusions

Except for a few isolated saline and sodic areas, soils naturally become more acidic with time. This process is accelerated when acid forming fertilizers are applied and when basic cations are removed with the harvested portions of the crop. Liming low value crops like wheat in the Pacific Northwest is not profitable until soil pH begins to effect crop yield. Direct seeders are in a unique situation because when crop yield begins to decline due to low pH, it might be too late to correct without the use of primary tillage. Research which is under way will help to answer many of the current questions regarding crop response to lime applications. Meanwhile, growers (especially direct seeders) should be considering alternative fertilizer formulations when they are economically feasible to reduce the acid inputs and ultimately reduce the need for lime applications.

References:

Barber, S.A. 1995. Soil Nutrient Bioavailability: A Mechanistic Approach. John Wiley and
Sons, Inc. New York, NY.

Hawkes, G.R. 1980. Western Fertilizer Handbook. The Interstate Printers and Publishers, Inc.
Danville, IL.

Mahler, R.L., A.R. Halvorson, and F.E. Koehler. 1985. Long-term acidification of farmland in northern Idaho and eastern Washington. Commun. in Soil Sci Plant Anal. 16:83-95.

Mahler, R.L. and R.E. McDole. 1987. Effect of soil pH on crop yield in northern Idaho. Agron J. 79:751-755.

Mortvedt, J.J., L.S. Murphy, and R.H. Follett. 1999. Fertilizer Technology and Application. Meister Publishing Co. Willoughby, OH.

     
 

Contact us: Hans Kok, (208)885-5971 | Accessibility | Copyright | Policies | WebStats | STEEP Acknowledgement
Hans Kok, WSU/UI Extension Conservation Tillage Specialist, UI Ag Science 231, PO Box 442339, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
Redesigned by Leila Styer, CAHE Computer Resource Unit; Maintained by Debbie Marsh, Dept. of Crop & Soil Sciences, WSU